Is more vocational education the answer?
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoOGk93dOuzoXdrdxkg2NlR6ZZCyJ8zv_-ZScVJEDYw8k4mUMKZ5TlMosuavA8xIIM7A3wL7U_bjWLeROuwgCcOwJyUmJ7Tvo78j-H6wWBFwcMYnsozWKakQlDCFk1kibU3OctHAsq8Fzs/s400/Fig_2a_men.jpg)
by Herman van de Werfhorst, Andrea Forster, Thijs Bol* A few years ago, Eric Hanushek gave a keynote lecture at a conference at the Amsterdam Centre for Inequality Studies. The talk was entitled "Is more vocational education the answer?" and spoke to debates in the United States about whether or not to strengthen the vocational education and training sector. The U.S. education system is much more “general” in nature than the German and Dutch education systems, which are more vocationally oriented. Is it sensible for the United States to adopt a German-style education system with a strong dual (work- and school-based) sector? Vocational education and training can mean very different things to different people. In some countries, it refers to education and training provided by and in schools, with no or limited exposure to real work situations. In other countries, it designates systems where much of the training is provided in a work place by the employer. The latter is often ...